6
main.tex
6
main.tex
@@ -149,8 +149,10 @@ However, Lemma~7 in \cite{Thorup_2008} does not generalize to all matroids and w
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Support size}
|
||||
|
||||
Recall that we construct the ideal tree packing recursively. Suppose that the ideal base packing for $M|F^*$ is has $n$ bases and let $m$ be the size of support of the optimal base packing of $M$. Then the number of bases in the ideal base packing of $M$ is $nm$. Note that $m$ is upperbounded by the size of the groundset.
|
||||
So the support size can be exponential.
|
||||
Recall that we construct the ideal base packing recursively. Suppose that the ideal base packing for $M|F^*$ is has $n$ bases and let $m$ be the size of support of the optimal base packing of $M$. Then the number of bases in the ideal base packing of $M$ is $nm$. Note that $m$ is upperbounded by the size of the groundset.
|
||||
The support size can be exponential. Consider a path with $n$ points and parallel edges. The depth of recursion can be $n-1$.
|
||||
|
||||
Do we need all bases in the packing?
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Rigidity matroids}
|
||||
\begin{conjecture}\label{conj:idealrigidbase}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user