hardness
This commit is contained in:
7
main.tex
7
main.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
|
||||
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
|
||||
\usepackage{chao}
|
||||
\usepackage{natbib}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ In other words, \nonuscut{} finds the cut that minimizes its capacity divided by
|
||||
These problems are interesting since they are related to central concepts in graph theory and help to design algorithms for hard problems on graph. One connections is expander graphs. The importance of expander graphs is thoroughly surveyed in \citep{hoory_expander_2006}. The optimum of \expansion{} is also known as Cheeger constant or conductance of a graph. \scut{} provides a 2-approximation of Cheeger constant, which is especially important in the context of expander graphs as it is a way to measure the edge expansion of a graph. \nonuscut{} is related to other cut problems such as Multicut and Balanced Separator.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{related works}
|
||||
\scut{} is generally hard. The currently best approximation algorithm has ratio $O(\sqrt{\log n})$ and running time $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ \citep{arora_osqrtlogn_2010}. Prior to this currently optimal result, there is a long line of research optimizing both the approximation ratio and the complexity, see \citep{arora_expander_2004,leighton_multicommodity_1999}
|
||||
\scut{} is APX-hard \citep{juliaJACMapxhard} and, assuming the Unique Game Conjecture, has no polynomial time constant factor aproximation algorithm\citep{chawla_hardness_2005}. The currently best approximation algorithm has ratio $O(\sqrt{\log n})$ and running time $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ \citep{arora_osqrtlogn_2010}. Prior to this currently optimal result, there is a long line of research optimizing both the approximation ratio and the complexity, see \citep{arora_expander_2004,leighton_multicommodity_1999}.
|
||||
There are also works concerning approximating \scut{} on special graph classes such as planar graphs \citep{lee_genus_2010}, graphs with low tree width \citep{gupta2013sparsestcutboundedtreewidth, Chalermsook_2024}.
|
||||
|
||||
One major open problem for \scut{} is the best approximation ratio for planar graphs. It is conjectured that the ratio for planar graphs is $O(1)$ but currently the best lowerbound is $O(\sqrt{\log n})$.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Literature Review}
|
||||
% Requirement: summarize previous research contributions and identify the gap or the specific problem
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user